Way back when I first started writing this site, the Oilers traded for Dwayne Roloson. While this was initially a good thing that subsequently went bad, it also gave me an interesting post about whether or not the CBA permitted the Wild to make the type of trade that they made. The objection that I had to the deal, from a CBA perspective, was that the Wild were getting something that they didn’t have the right to. Specifically, the deal gave the Wild a pick that was conditional on the Oilers resigning Dwayne Roloson. My take was as follows:
Roloson is supposed to be unrestricted free agent but he’s effectively had a restraint put on that status by the deal made by the Wild and Oilers. Minnesota managed to do what the CBA otherwise prohibits and will collect compensation in certain circumstances. They had no interest in Roloson’s rights following this season but somehow managed to create a compensable interest, albeit a limited one. Theoretically, this will depress the market for those players services. To take Dwayne Roloson as an example, the Oilers are presumably now willing to pay slightly less than they otherwise would have been. This affects not only Roloson’s value but the value of every other goalie on the market.
A second post on the topic was here. Vic Ferrari made what I think was the best counter-argument to my position but it was one based on practicalities rather than the terms of the CBA: in Roloson’s specific case, it made sense to roll the dice on altering the market with going to Edmonton, so that he could get a chance to start instead of backup. Tough to argue with that, particularly with how it’s played out.
The Wild have just done another of these trades, as reported by Michael Russo of the Star-Tribune. Brian Rolston has been traded to Tampa Bay and if he signs, at any time, with the Lightning, the Wild get a pick from them. I don’t know how this can possibly comply with the CBA. Rolston’s supposed to be unrestricted and the Wild and Lightning have come to an agreement whereby he isn’t. I’m puzzled by the NHLPA’s refusal to address this, particularly with the increasing popularity of these types of move.